Autocad Vs Microstation: Summary and Evaluation

Autocad Vs Microstation Summary and EvaluationPatricia FerrerasT suitable of Contents (Jump to)What is CAD?AutoCAD and MicroStation HistoryResearch2D propose Features3D Design FeaturesInteroperabilityConclusionBibliographyWhat is CAD?CAD is an abbreviation of Computer Aided Design, and refers to software utilise to create detai take, on the button drawings and technical illustrations. CAD software is capable of creating tabular (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) models. (WhatIs.com, 2011)AutoCAD and MicroStation HistoryAutoCAD was introduced in 1982 as a desktop application. Since 2010, it has evolved into a mobile web and deprave based application, currently marketed as AutoCAD 360. (Wikipedia, 2014)MicroStation was introduced early on in 1987 with the capacity to write to design files with the extension .DGN. In its early days, it had simple modification abilities, and it was capable of displaying each element in their intermediate states during placement. MicroStation V8i (SELEC Tseries 2)- July 2010 added corporate channelise cloud support. (Bentley, 2014)ResearchThe scope of my interview is to compare the two leaders software packages in design, two of them are used by a wide range of professionals, mainly in the fileds of Engineering, Architecture and Indus running play Design.Different bulk take over different needs or preferences, but I tenderness to keep my look as objective as possible, that is why I going to focus is three key aspects of the software, 2D, 3D and interoperability.2D Design FeaturesThe similitude is based in the latest versions of each program, and on the uncommitted functions and tools for managing 2D designs that a CAD software provides. (Chief, 2012)AutoCAD 2013MicroStation V8iIn 2D Designing, what makes users happy are the features and tools that AutoCAD provides, such(prenominal) asThe Sketch tool which altogetherows 2D Drafts to be intuitively drawnA customizable tool palette, color palette and command logTape vers e Tool, text Box and Snap to grid functionalities,From 3D models generates 2D DrawingsEven though MicroStation provides many useful tools, it is lacking some key features for 2D Designing. Its available features acceptAn groundbreaking sketch toolColor palette, tool palettes and command logs, all of which are customizableFrom 3D Models, could generate 2D Drawings3D Design FeaturesThese features include Simulation, 3D Modeling and animation using features provided by the CAD software. (Chief, 2012) (enggcyclopedia, 2012)AutoCAD 2013MicroStation V8iAutoCAD 2013 include the following features and tools needed for the 3D Modeling, Rendering and AnimationHas parametric Modeling Tools worldly changes as they occur, so it could be viewed in real timeExtrude 3D Models from 2D DrawingsPhotorealistic models could be created.Basic animation projects are enable through with(predicate) its animation featuresAutoCAD is recognized as a business-oriented design tool, and is regarded as following industry standards.MicroStation provides more of a thorough platform for 3D Modeling and Animation. It is more advanced than AutoCAD in some respectsParametric modeling tools and featuresReal time modifications stop be previewed as they are implementedMicrostation can make 3D Models from 2D Drawings with 3D geometric surfacesPhotorealistic models can be achieved3D Printing is supportedMicroStation claims to respect its users by providing them with a CAD environment reinforced to cater for all their needs.InteroperabilityThis factor relates to collaboration functionality with new(prenominal) CAD Applications, the ability for more than unmatched designer to work simultaneously on one platform, cloud features, and a number of another(prenominal) functions. (Chief, 2012) (Alvarez, 2006)AutoCAD 2013MicroStation V8iAutoCAD 2013s full-featured user-interface and interoperability features include the followingSupport for readable and writable file formats such as DWG, PDF, 3DS, DWFT he Autodesk Cloud Feature, Autodesk 360 allows designers on the CAD software product Workspace to work away from the office. It provides each user with roughly 3 GB of space, and this figure can be increased to cater for file sharing.Integration of Google subr come inineThe users felt that the re-design introduced with Land Development was very different from the previous applications such as CivilCAD and Softdesk.MicroStation is an application with total integration of other applications within Bentley or orthogonal applications that develop in a MicroStation environment . It wins the war of interoperability. The main features include the followingIt supports readable and writeable file formats including Sketchup, DWF, Revit, PDF,DWGAn AutoCAD interoperability function which allow designers to work with all of Autodesks CAD VersionsGeo-location is supported by providing designers with coordinates for actual real-life buildings. It allows integration of Google Maps, and allows fo r sharing and networking between designers.Designers work is protected from intellectual theft via a digital signature featureThe users find quite easy to use the different applications of MicroStation, is very similar design.ConclusionWhich one is better? Well, from a personal point of view, AutoCAD is a clear winner when it comes to 2D Design. This is possibly because it was the first CAD software that I learned how to use, and the one that I have used more often. But I am not the only one that thinks this many professionals that use AutoCAD agreed that AutoCAD still trumps the MicroStation with its advanced 2D Drafting capabilities (Chief, 2012)When it comes to 3D support, I have to give this to MicroStation. I lost count of how many coffees I had while the computer was rendering a 3D Design. It takes practically forever, so the shell thing to do was to let the machine to do the magic and take a break. (Alvarez, 2006)In conclusion, both CAD tools provide features which classify them as advanced drafting tools. These tools can be used by CAD designers to draw and design both 2D and 3D Designs, independent of their complexity. (Prakoso, 2011)In summary, I would regard AutoCAD as a better drafting tool, but MicroStation as a better CAD platform.BibliographyHistory of MicroStation MicroStation Wiki MicroStation Be Communities by Bentley. 2014. History of MicroStation MicroStation Wiki MicroStation Be Communities by Bentley. ONLINE Available at http//communities.bentley.com/products/microstation/w/microstation__wiki/3164.history-of-microstation.aspx. Accessed 10 March 2014.Autodesk Company. 2014. Autodesk Company. ONLINE Available at http//usa.autodesk.com/company/. Accessed 10 March 2014.AutoCAD Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2014. AutoCAD Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. ONLINE Available at http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AutoCAD. Accessed 15 March 2014.BE Magazine En Espanol Volume 1-Issue 12. 2014. BE Magazine En Espanol Volume 1-Issue 12. ONL INE Available at http//www.nxtbook.com/fx/books/bemagazine/vol1issue1spanmexico/index.php?startpage=12. Accessed 15 March 2014.MicroStation vs. AutoCAD which is better. 2014. MicroStation vs. AutoCAD which is better. ONLINE Available at http//www.indiacadworks.com/blog/microstation-vs-autocad-comparing-features/. Accessed 15 March 2014.Whats the Difference Between AutoCAD and Other 3D programs?. 2014. Whats the Difference Between AutoCAD and Other 3D programs?. ONLINE Available at http//animation.about.com/od/faqs/f/Whats-The-Difference-Between-Autocad-And-Other-3d-Programs.htm. Accessed 15 March 2014.Microstation or Revit..what to choose? Forum Archinect. 2014. Microstation or Revit..what to choose? Forum Archinect. ONLINE Available at http//archinect.com/forum/thread/96142/microstation-or-revit-what-to-choose. Accessed 18 March 2014.AutoCAD versus MicroStation, which one is the best? CAD Notes. 2014. AutoCAD versus MicroStation, which one is the best? CAD Notes. ONLINE Ava ilable at http//www.cad-notes.com/autocad-versus-microstation-which-one-is-the-best/. Accessed 21 March 2014.. 2014. . ONLINE Available at http//www.google.ie/url?sa=trct=jq=esrc=ssource=webcd=6ved=0CF0QFjAFurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcad-software.findthebest.com%2Fcompare%2F5-19%2FAutoCAD-vs-MicroStation-V8iei=So4sU5j-MqWI7AaL5YGgBgusg=AFQjCNHRN8j20Fq52oVzAW6c2-7ihTQpNQbvm=bv.62922401,d.ZGU. Accessed 21 March 2014. cut Childhood Obesity Health Promotion or CBTReducing Childhood Obesity Health Promotion or CBTNuRS21010 Understanding Evidence-Based Nursing Practice design scatheBoolean OperatorHitsPopulation ChildhoodChildhood, three-year-old people, baby birdren, child, youth.(Childhood corpulency or young people or children or child or your ) and health promotion or cognitive behavioural therapy38Intervention health promotionHealth, promotion,(Childhood obesity or young people or children or child or your ) and health promotion or cognitive behavioural therapy21Comparison Cognitive Behav ioural TherapyCBT, behavioural, behavioural(Childhood obesity or young people or children or child or your ) and health promotion or (cognitive behavioural therapy or CBT )17Outcome obesityObese, weight gain.(Childhood or young people or children or child or youth ) and ( obesity or obese or weight gain) and health promotion or (cognitive behavioural therapy or CBT )11Which is more in force(p) in reducing childhood obesity health promotion or Cognitive behavioural therapy?ConceptTermsTruncateHitsPopulation ChildhoodChildhood, young people, children, child, youth.Child* obesity health promotion or cognitive behavioural therapy26Intervention Nurse led health promotionHealth, promotion,Child* obesity and health promotion and cognitive behavioural therapy15Comparison Cognitive Behavioural TherapyCBT, behavioural, behaviouralChild* obesity health promotion or cognitive behaviour* tharap?10The first part of my essay will be based on the evaluation on my question this will include looking at the strengths, weaknesses and how I could improve it if I were to do it again.I precious to research the question which is more effective in reducing childhood obesity, health promotion or Cognitive behavioural therapy? As I find the topic childhood obesity authentically fascinating especially with the current national epidemic of childhood obesity. This made me realise that its a concerning health issue so I wanted to explore the possible interventions which were available for those suffering from childhood obesity. To do this I compared one of the most common interventions (health promotion) to one of the emerging interventions being used to trade childhood obesity (cognitive behavioural therapy). I used the CINHAL database for my literature search as it provides indexing of the top nursing and allied health literature (CINHAL, 2013) and offers training relevant to my question.When researching I used truncation I decided to truncate the terms in my research question as I wa nted to discover the information which was relevant to my question rather than foreign data, as it did not correlate to my question. This worked as each time I truncated I was able to gather data which related to my research question so this was beneficial mechanism when gathering relevant data.A research mechanism which I used was the Boolean operator to help me find appropriate literature. Boolean operators utilise the terms and, or and not to restrict, increase, or assign searches depending on Boolean logic, which describes how Boolean operators manipulates large sets of data (Barker et al 2011).Boolean operators link keywords and phrases this informs the search engine how to interpret the search, which helps hear the resolves the researcher is looking for (Barker et al 2011). By utilizing the Boolean operator it helped narrow my search and provided me with the literature which was relevant to my research question. Because at first when I researched I got a lot of hits but a majority if the literature was irrelevant and therefore not required, but by using the boolean operator it allowed me to access specific literature for my research question.I think I could have improved my research question by making my research question more specific for instance instead of childhood obesity which is a very large age group I could have narrowed it down to teenagers. As this will give me a sense of direction when looking for back up literature as its a specific age group this can be supported by Sackett (2000) who sates that by asking a precise question you can look for specific knowledge for chosen research topic.Whereas with my current question I have a lot to cover as it looks at childhood obesity which is a broad age group, which makes it difficult gathering backing literature. Another weakness is that although I gathered literature for my research question a majority of it was applicable to health promotion interventions in comparison to cognitive behaviour al therapy in relation to childhood obesity. So to transfer this I think I would have compared health promotional techniques to non-health promotion health techniques. This will ensure I get a balance of supporting literature between the comparisons, as there was little literature for cognitive behavioural therapy.This part of the essay will critically appraise intervention for unable airway headroom in asthma attack attacktic children a gibeled and randomised clinical trial (Lima et al, 2013). The CASP tool (Guyatt et al 1993) will be used to achieve this.1. Was the question clear?The population that was studied was 42 asthmatic children age 2. Was this a randomised controlled trial?The study used a randomised clinical trial (RCT). A RCT is where partakers are randomly allotted to one or more control groups this is recoverd by the number of interventions (Parahoo, 2006). Randomisation means allocating applicants to experimental or control groups at random so that partakers have an equal likelihood of being placed in either group (Lang, 1997). This eradicates selection bias and offers equilibrium amid recognised and unidentified confounding factors to make a control group similar to the treatment group (Akbong, 2005).The method was apt for the question being researched as Machin Fayers, (2010) states that RCTs are the principal mode for defining the comparative efficacy and safety of substitute medical devices, interventions or treatments. This method is apt for the research as the question aimed to analyse the effectiveness of an intervention for the nursing diagnosis of ineffective airway clearance in asthmatic children. The study used this method to say the effect of asthmatic of an intervention for asthmatic children. Lawrence et al (2010) RCTs are the finest for trials determining the impact of health interventions, theyre very robust and systematic for critiquing the efficiency of health interventions. Though there is a risk of bias when there are errors in the strategy and organisation of a trial (Akobeng, 2005).3.Were participants allocated to intervention group and control groups?The partakers were aptly allocated to intervention and control groups. As participants were allocated to groups via generating an algorithm of random numbers through the use of the R software (Lima et al, 2013). The inclusion criteria in the study were asthma identified by a doctor, based on assessment and physical existence defining features and linked factors termed in the NANDA international taxonomy age 4. Were participants and staff subterfuge to participants study group?The team member who did the randomisation did not partake in the interventions or the outcome evaluation. This shows that the study used blinding which is vital as there is a threat in RCTs exploring the benefits of one intervention over an alternative as it can impact outcomes, causing influenced results. Blinding trials reduces bias, blinding refers to the enjoyment o f stopping partakers, health professionals, and those gathering and examining data from knowing who is in the experimental group and who is in the control group, to avert them from being influenced by such knowledge (Day, 2000). Studies show that by blinding perseverings and health professionals avoids bias. Trials which didnt blind bore more estimates of treatment effects than trials in which authors conveyed blinding (odds ratios overstated, by 17%) (Schulz Grimes, 2002).5. Were all participants accounted in conclusion?All the participants in the study group were followed up for its conclusion. The participants in the control group did not get the option to be in the intervention group or vice versa.6 .Were participants in all groups followed up and data collection in the same way? All the participants were followed up in the study. The effect of the intervention was evaluated at a single moment, due to the obstruction of secretion as it reversed quickly and linked to working wit h other professionals (Lima et al, 2013).7. Did the study have enough participants to minimise the chance of play?The study used chi-squared test for power calculation. The test aims to test the hypothesis of no connexion between two or multiple groups, criteria and population (West, 2008). The chi test found P=0.061, statically significance was assumed at P 8. What is the main result?The study found an improvement in obstructive symptoms in those who took the intervention offered, with great alterations in the displays of choking and extrinsic breath sounds. The generalisations may be contain as children in the intervention group show higher values for age and weight. The group also consisted of children under the age of 36 months thus credibly to have asthma attacks (Lima et al, 2013). This may question the validity of the results found. The study also found there was little research in this topic making it dispute when trying to compare findings with other research (Lima et al, 2013). The study uses a small sample as there are only 42 participants in the study, so not really representative. Akobeng, (2005) argues that when a study uses a small sample of participants in it can be difficult identify the real chance variables of results found from both the intervention and control group. The study highlights the need for research on airway clearance techniques to assess the effectiveness of its use. The findings suggest studies to offer planned interventions during hospitalization to determine the link between the intervention and a decreased in the duration of hospital stay (Lima et al, 2013).9. How precise are these results?The study used MannWhitney test uses the findings of the t-test to identify variances amid two groups of habitually distributed population (Burns Grove, 2005). The Mann Whitney test found that after the intervention, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group for the indicators of choking (16.83 vs. 26 .17, P = 0.007) and adventitious breath sounds (16.4 vs. 26.6, P = 0.005). This illustrates that the detected variance between the groups is doubtful to have happened by chance hence the null hypothesises rejected due to no variance and the other hypothesis as there is an actual variance in the intervention group is taken into account (Akobeng, 2005).10. Were all vital outcomes considered so the results can be applied?The participants in the study are classified as asthmatic it doesnt specify the type of asthma they have. Knowing they type of asthma they had i.e. chronic or acute asthma is beneficial as will illustrate if there is a different effect on a patient with certain type of asthma. For instance Schechter (2007) found that airway clearance therapy has little or no effect on acute asthma, so techniques used in this study may not be applicable for those with acute asthma. Airway clearance techniques requires training in dictate for patient or carers to carry it out correctly, this may be an issue for some as they may not have the funding or money for training.In relation to parents and carers airway clearance techniques may be a barrier for them when implementing it to their child. As airway clearance techniques require equipment and considerable amount of time (Walsh et al, 2011) to carry out in order to ensure that it is carried out correctly and effectively on child. This can be an issue for parents and carers especially if they dont have the time due to other issues such as work or taking care of other children.According Pryor (2009) to policy makers and health care professionals in the UK, are less liable(predicate) to utilise the intervention of airway clearance in asthma patients due to the uncertainty of the effectiveness of its usage in asthma patients this is also because of little research available on this topic. The study itself also mentions the lack of research available on airway clearance Walsh et al, (2011) techniques for asthma (Lima et al, 2013). Also found although airway clearance techniques have progressed over the years there is little research to illustrate the effectiveness of airway clearance techniques amid the child population who have asthma (Walsh et al, 2011). write ListAkobeng AK. Evidence-based child health. 1. Principles of evidence-basedmedicine. Arch Dis Child 20059083740Barker D., Barker M., Pinard , K., (2011). London Cengage Learning.Blaikie N. (2009). Designing Social Research. 2nd ed. UK Polity Press.CINHAL (2013). CINHAL Database (online). Available athttp//www.ebscohost.com/nursing/products/cinahl-databases/cinahl-complete. Accessed at 19th November 2013.Burns N. Grove S.K, (2005). The practise of nursing research conduct, critique and utilisation. 5th ed. USA Elsevier Saunders.Chia KS. Randomisation magical cure for bias. Ann Acad Med capital of Singapore2000295634.Day SJ, Altman DG. Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. BMJ2000321504.Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, and Cook DJ (1993 ).Users guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. JAMA 1993 270 (21) 2598-2601 and JAMA 1994 271(1) 59-63Lawrence M. Friedman, Furberg C.D, DeMets D (2010). fundamentals of Clinical Trials (online). Available at http//books.google.co.uk/books?id=pIx-0LvD6agCpg=PA97dq=advantages+of+randomised+controlled+trialshl=ensa=Xei=ACbLUtvWBdG0hAf094EIredir_esc=yv=onepageq=advantages%20of%20randomised%20controlled%20trialsf=false Acessed at sixth January 2014.Lang TA, Secic M. How to report statistics in medicine. Philadelphia AmericanCollege of Physicians, 1997.Lima L.H.O, Lopes M.V.O, Falco R.T.S, Freitas R.M.R, Oliveira TF, da costa M.C.C (2013). Intervention for ineffective airway clearance in asthmatic children A controlled and randomized clinical trial. International Journal of NursingPractice 2013 19 8894Machin D Fayers P, (2010). Randomized Clinical Trials Design, Practice and Reporting (online). Available athttp//books.google.co.uk/book s?id=l6oxPO9riPYCprintsec=frontcoverdq=randomised+clinical+trialhl=ensa=Xei=wSPLUuiqNNSKhQem_YCgDgredir_esc=yv=onepageq=randomised%20clinical%20trialf=false . Accessed at 6th January 2014.NANDA, (2012).Defining NANDA (online). Available at http//www.nanda.org/nanda-international-taxonomy-licensing.html. Accessed at 6th January 2014.Olbricht G Wong Y,(2008). Power and Sample Size Calculation (online). Available at http//www.scribd.com/doc/195151500/Power-and-Sample-Size-Calculation . Accessed at 6th January 2014.Parahoo K. (2006) Nursing research principles, process and issues 2 nd ed. Basingstoke Palgrave.Pryor J.A. (2009).Physiotherapy for airway clearance in adults (pdf). Available at http//www.ersj.org.uk/content/14/6/1418.full.pdf Accessed at third January 2014.Sackett D., Straus S., Richardson S., Rosenberg W., Haynes B (2000). Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM. London BMJ Publishing Group.Schulz KF. Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomi sedcontrolled trials why bother? Evid Based Nurs 20005367.Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensionsof methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects incontrolled trials. JAMA 199527340812.Schechter M S.(2007) Airway Clearance Applications in Infants and Children (pdf). Available at http//www.assobrafir.com.br/imagens_up/artigos/Airway_Clearance_Applications_in_Infants_and_Children.pdf Accessed at 27th December 2013.Walsh B.K, Hood K, Merritt G. (2011). Paediatric airway maintenance and clearance in the acute care setting how to stay out of devil (online). Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21944689. Accessed at 6th January 2014.West M.D (2008). Use of the Chi-Square Statistic (pdf) .Available at http//ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/fundepiii/PDFs/Lecture17.pdf Accessed at 6th January 2014.